Question: "Do you see something strangely amiss in the fact that three
buildings collapsed at the WTC on September 11th when only two were even
damaged by airplanes flying into them and even then the fires were not
hot enough to melt steel; and the media seems afraid to come forward to
discuss the details?”
The Financial Armageddon Economic Collapse Blog tracks trends and forecasts , futurists , visionaries , free investigative journalists , researchers , Whistelblowers , truthers and many more
A doco I saw some years ago had the third building being "dropped" a week after 9/11. Even so, a week would not have been enough time to prep the building for controlled demo. I think the main argument against the controlled demolition theory is the sheer scale of the conspiracy needed to rig the building - not one troubled soul came forward before 9/11. Troubled souls come forward left right and center on other subjects. The puffs of "smoke" punching out from each floor as the bulding above collapsed, could have been dust displaced by the falling debris(?)
A doco I saw some years ago had the third building being "dropped" a week after 9/11. Even so, a week would not have been enough time to prep the building for controlled demo. I think the main argument against the controlled demolitions theory is the sheer scale of the conspiracy needed to rig the building - not one troubled soul came forward before 9/11. Troubled souls come forward left right and center on other subjects. The puffs of "smoke" punching out from each floor as the bulding above collapsed, could have been dust displaced by the falling debris(?)
A doco I saw some years ago had the third building being "dropped" a week after 9/11. Even so, a week would not have been enough time to prep the building for controlled demo. I think the main argument against the controlled demolition theory is the sheer scale of the conspiracy needed to rig the building - not one troubled soul came forward before 9/11. Troubled souls come forward left right and center on other subjects. The puffs of "smoke" punching out from each floor as the bulding above collapsed, could have been dust displaced by the falling debris(?)
ReplyDeleteA doco I saw some years ago had the third building being "dropped" a week after 9/11. Even so, a week would not have been enough time to prep the building for controlled demo. I think the main argument against the controlled demolitions theory is the sheer scale of the conspiracy needed to rig the building - not one troubled soul came forward before 9/11. Troubled souls come forward left right and center on other subjects. The puffs of "smoke" punching out from each floor as the bulding above collapsed, could have been dust displaced by the falling debris(?)
ReplyDelete