Showing posts with label George Carlin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Carlin. Show all posts
Sunday, June 11, 2017
George Carlin speaks trump and 2016 ( way before )
George Carlin speaks trump and 2016 ( way before )
The Financial Armageddon Economic Collapse Blog tracks trends and forecasts , futurists , visionaries , free investigative journalists , researchers , Whistelblowers , truthers and many more
Wednesday, May 3, 2017
George Carlin Exposes The Illuminati
Critical thinking is rare these days, if everyone used critical thinking skills, they would not stand a chance
George Carlin been ahead of time when nobody d idnt take his truth seriously back then they thought it was all jokes back then noo!!..he was trying to wake up ppl back then about the illuminati but ppl d idnt wanna listen back then like some still don't wanna listen now
The Financial Armageddon Economic Collapse Blog tracks trends and forecasts , futurists , visionaries , free investigative journalists , researchers , Whistelblowers , truthers and many more
Monday, March 6, 2017
George Carlin - Political Correctness is Fascism pretending to be Manners
George Carlin : Political Correctness is America's New Fascism
“Political correctness is America's newest form of intolerance, and it is especially pernicious because it comes disguised as tolerance. It presents itself as fairness, yet attempts to restrict and control people's language with strict codes and rigid rules. I'm not sure that's the way to fight discrimination. I'm not sure silencing people or forcing them to alter their speech is the best method for solving problems that go much deeper than speech.”
The Financial Armageddon Economic Collapse Blog tracks trends and forecasts , futurists , visionaries , free investigative journalists , researchers , Whistelblowers , truthers and many more
Friday, June 10, 2016
George Carlin -- The Self Esteem Movement
Carlin weighs in on some of the nitwittery children face in current times.
The Financial Armageddon Economic Collapse Blog tracks trends and forecasts , futurists , visionaries , free investigative journalists , researchers , Whistelblowers , truthers and many more
Monday, May 16, 2016
George Carlin 7 dirty words NOT to say on TV..............
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Sunday, April 13, 2014
The Best of George Carlin: Exposing our government and fall of humanity one joke at a time
George Denis Patrick Carlin (May 12, 1937 -- June 22, 2008) was an American stand-up comedian, social critic, satirist, actor, and writer/author who won five Grammy Awards for his comedy albums. Carlin was noted for his black humor as well as his thoughts on politics, the English language, psychology, religion, and various taboo subjects. Carlin and his "Seven Dirty Words" comedy routine were central to the 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case F.C.C. v. Pacifica Foundation, in which a 5--4 decision by the justices affirmed the government's power to regulate indecent material on the public airwaves.
The first of his 14 stand-up comedy specials for HBO was filmed in 1977. From the late 1980s, Carlin's routines focused on socio-cultural criticism of modern American society. He often commented on contemporary political issues in the United States and satirized the excesses of American culture. His final HBO special, It's Bad for Ya, was filmed less than four months before his death. In 2004, Carlin placed second on the Comedy Central list of the 100 greatest stand-up comedians of all time, ahead of Lenny Bruce and behind Richard Pryor. He was a frequent performer and guest host on The Tonight Show during the three-decade Johnny Carson era, and hosted the first episode of Saturday Night Live. In 2008, he was posthumously awarded the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor.
Thursday, October 17, 2013
George Carlin ~ They gotcha by the balls!
George Carlin was right but didn't go far enough....it's the bankers pure and simple...the Federal Reserve banking families....that's right, families...it's OWNED by a few super elite rich families....not by the U.S. government...not even U.S. families. President Andrew Jackson threw them out of the country when he was president and they tried to assassinate him... All the wars were started (including the civil war) by the bankers. They killed Lincoln, Kennedy and tried to kill Reagan too.
Thursday, May 30, 2013
Noam Chomsky and George Carlin on Republicans and Social Security
Noam Chomsky and George Carlin on Republicans and Social Security
Republicans want desperately to privatize Social Security so that their Wall Street/banker friends can have your safety-net money for their financial schemes, all the while wanting to sink more and more taxpayer money into the already massive "defense" spending. Republicans also appear to be attempting to demonize the term "entitlements" so that we equate Social Security, along with "welfare," as "Liberal" entitlement programs to be viewed as the internal "danger" facing the American way of life.
"The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly . . . it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over."
[Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Minister of Propaganda]
Noam Chomsky, Institute Professor and Professor (Emeritus) in the Department of Linguistics & Philosophy at MIT, where he has worked for over 50 years comments
on the Republican's Party's ongoing effort to privatize the Social Security fund.
Quoted from the video:
"Social Security's not in any crisis...the trust fund alone will fully pay benefits for another thirty years or so...to worry about a possible problem thirty years from now which can incidentally be fixed with a little bit of tampering here and there as was done in 1983 -- to worry about that makes absolutely no sense unless you're trying to destroy the program. It's a very successful program, a large number of people rely on it...very low administrative costs, extremely efficient and no burden on the deficit, it doesn't add to the deficit."
"The effort to try to prevent the Social Security program...that's just a hidden way of trying to undermine and destroy it. Now there has been a lot of opposition to it since the 1930's on the part of sectors of extreme wealth and privilege, especially financial capital -- they don't like it for several reasons. One is, for the rich it's meaningless...another is if the financial institutions, the insurance companies can get their hands on this huge financial resource -- for example, if it's privatized in some way or vouchers - that's a huge bonanza, they'll have trillions of dollars to play with -- the banks, the investment firms, and so on."
"But, I think, myself, there's a more subtle reason they're opposed to it...the Social Security's based on a principle -- it's based on the principle that you care about other people -- you care whether the widow across town, the disabled widow's going to be able to have food to eat. And that's a notion you have to drive out of peoples heads -- the idea of solidarity, sympathy, mutual support -- that's doctrinally dangerous. The preferred doctrine's are just care about yourself - don't care about anyone else. That's a very good way to trap and control people. And the very idea that we're in it together, that we care about each other, that we have responsibility for one another -- that's sort of frightening to those who want a society which is dominated by power, authority, wealth, in which people are passive and obedient. And I think that's a considerable part of the drive on the part of small privileged sectors to undermine a very efficient, very effective system on which a large part of the population relies -- actually relies more than ever...they have nothing to else to rely on but the pittance they get from Social Security. To take that away would be just disastrous."
Republicans want desperately to privatize Social Security so that their Wall Street/banker friends can have your safety-net money for their financial schemes, all the while wanting to sink more and more taxpayer money into the already massive "defense" spending. Republicans also appear to be attempting to demonize the term "entitlements" so that we equate Social Security, along with "welfare," as "Liberal" entitlement programs to be viewed as the internal "danger" facing the American way of life.
"The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly . . . it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over."
[Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Minister of Propaganda]
Noam Chomsky, Institute Professor and Professor (Emeritus) in the Department of Linguistics & Philosophy at MIT, where he has worked for over 50 years comments
on the Republican's Party's ongoing effort to privatize the Social Security fund.
Quoted from the video:
"Social Security's not in any crisis...the trust fund alone will fully pay benefits for another thirty years or so...to worry about a possible problem thirty years from now which can incidentally be fixed with a little bit of tampering here and there as was done in 1983 -- to worry about that makes absolutely no sense unless you're trying to destroy the program. It's a very successful program, a large number of people rely on it...very low administrative costs, extremely efficient and no burden on the deficit, it doesn't add to the deficit."
"The effort to try to prevent the Social Security program...that's just a hidden way of trying to undermine and destroy it. Now there has been a lot of opposition to it since the 1930's on the part of sectors of extreme wealth and privilege, especially financial capital -- they don't like it for several reasons. One is, for the rich it's meaningless...another is if the financial institutions, the insurance companies can get their hands on this huge financial resource -- for example, if it's privatized in some way or vouchers - that's a huge bonanza, they'll have trillions of dollars to play with -- the banks, the investment firms, and so on."
"But, I think, myself, there's a more subtle reason they're opposed to it...the Social Security's based on a principle -- it's based on the principle that you care about other people -- you care whether the widow across town, the disabled widow's going to be able to have food to eat. And that's a notion you have to drive out of peoples heads -- the idea of solidarity, sympathy, mutual support -- that's doctrinally dangerous. The preferred doctrine's are just care about yourself - don't care about anyone else. That's a very good way to trap and control people. And the very idea that we're in it together, that we care about each other, that we have responsibility for one another -- that's sort of frightening to those who want a society which is dominated by power, authority, wealth, in which people are passive and obedient. And I think that's a considerable part of the drive on the part of small privileged sectors to undermine a very efficient, very effective system on which a large part of the population relies -- actually relies more than ever...they have nothing to else to rely on but the pittance they get from Social Security. To take that away would be just disastrous."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)