Saturday, February 11, 2017

New Elite Whistleblower Exposes Global Warming Hoax


Brand new elite whistleblower smashes global warming science

Awarded climate medal by Obama—now he finds enormous fraud and exposes it









Transcript : brand new elite whistleblower smashes 0:02 global warming science awarded climate 0:05 metal by obama now he finds enormous 0:08 fraud and exposes it 0:10 memo to president Trump and Steve benen 0:13 here it is said the table put the 0:16 napkins in your lap and feast on this 0:18 revelation by jon rappoport februari six 0:22 2017 a highly respected medal-winning 0:27 climate scientists just wound up in 0:29 through a giant monkey wrench into 0:31 global warming science his name John 0:35 Bates his target a recent fraudulent 0:39 study that claimed the uncomfortable 0:41 pause and warming was really no pause at 0:43 all that study pretending warming and 0:46 never stopped was time to help 0:48 negotiating nations at the climate 0:50 summit in Paris it was time to help them 0:53 an actor Akoni on economic measures to 0:55 reduce warming but Bates reveals that 0:59 study was cooked on several counts 1:02 it was such a mess no self-respecting 1:04 scientist would sign onto it 1:06 however scientists did sign onto it and 1:10 a prestigious journal science published 1:13 it apparently the brains at science were 1:16 on vacation or they were determined to 1:19 play ball under system globalist plan to 1:21 drastically reduce co2 producing energy 1:24 production and nations across the globe 1:26 thus escalating poverty in order to save 1:30 it all from frying here our choice 1:32 quotes from David rose exclusive daily 1:34 mail article that exposes the 1:36 far-reaching deception the mail on 1:39 Sunday today reveals astonishing 1:41 evidence that the organization that is 1:42 the world's leading source of climate 1:44 data rush to publish a landmark paper 1:47 that exaggerated global warming and 1:49 which times to influence the historic 1:51 Paris agreement on climate change a 1:54 high-level whistleblower has told this 1:56 newspaper that America's national 1:58 oceanic and atmospheric administration 2:00 no breached its own rules on scientific 2:03 integrity when it published a 2:05 sensational but flawed fraudulent report 2:08 aimed at making the maximum possible 2:10 impact on world leaders including Barack 2:13 Obama and David Cameron at the UN 2:16 climate conference in paris in 2015 the 2:19 fraudulent report claims that the pause 2:22 or slowdown in global warming in the 2:24 period since 1998 revealed by UN 2:28 scientists in 2013 never existed and 2:32 that world temperatures have been rising 2:33 faster than scientists 2:35 expected launched by Noah with a 2:37 public-relations fanfare it was splashed 2:40 across the world's media and cited 2:43 repeatedly by politicians and 2:45 policymakers but the whistleblower dr. 2:48 John Bates a top NOAA scientists with an 2:51 impeccable reputation has shown the mail 2:54 on sunday irrefutable evidence that the 2:56 paper was based on misleading 2:58 unverified data it was never subjected 3:01 to know as rigorous internal evaluation 3:03 process which dr. Bates devised his 3:07 vehement objections to the publication 3:09 of the faulty date were overridden by 3:12 his Noah superiors in what he describes 3:14 as a blatant attempt to intensify the 3:16 impact of what became known as the 3:18 fraudulent possible sister paper his 3:22 disclosures are likely to stiffen 3:24 president Trump's determination to enact 3:26 his pledges to reverse his predecessors 3:28 green policies into withdrawal from the 3:31 Paris deal so triggering an intense 3:33 political row in an exclusive interview 3:35 dr. Bates accused the author of the 3:38 paper 3:39 thomas carlyle who was until last year 3:42 director of the notes section that 3:43 produces climate data the national 3:46 centers for environmental information 3:48 inside of insisting on decisions and 3:51 scientific choices that maximize warming 3:53 and minimize documentation dot in an 3:55 effort to discredit the notion of a 3:57 global warming pause rushed so that he 4:00 could time publication to influence 4:02 national and international deliberations 4:04 on climate policy both datasets used in 4:08 fraudulent study or flawed this 4:11 newspaper has learned that Noah has now 4:13 decided that the sea data set will have 4:15 to be replaced and substantially revised 4:17 just 18 months after it was issued 4:20 because it used unreliable methods which 4:22 overstated the speed of warming the 4:25 revised data will show both lower 4:27 temperatures and a slower rate and the 4:29 recent warming trend the land 4:31 temperature data set used by the study 4:33 was afflicted by devastating bugs and 4:35 its software that rendered its findings 4:37 unstable the paper fraudulent study 4:40 relied on a preliminary alpha version of 4:44 the data which was never approved or 4:46 verified 4:47 none of the data on which the paper was 4:49 based was properly archived ash a 4:51 mandatory requirement meant to ensure 4:53 that raw data and the software used to 4:56 process it is accessible to other 4:58 scientists so they can verify no results 5:01 dr. Bates retired from no had the end of 5:04 last year after a 40-year career in 5:07 meteorology and climate science as 5:09 recently as 2014 the Obama 5:12 administration awarded him a special 5:14 gold medal for his work in setting new 5:17 supposedly binding standards to produce 5:19 and preserve climate data records yet 5:22 when it came to the paper times to 5:24 influence the Paris conference dr. Bates 5:27 said these standards were flagrantly 5:29 ignored the fraudulent paper was 5:32 published in jun 2015 by the journal 5:35 Science entitled possible artifacts of 5:38 data biases in the recent global surface 5:40 warming hiatus the document said the 5:43 widely reported warming pause or slow 5:46 down with amit but dr. Bates said this 5:49 increase in temperatures was achieved by 5:52 dubious means it's kierra was an upward 5:55 adjustment of readings from fixed and 5:57 floating buoys which are generally 5:59 reliable to bring them into line with 6:01 readings from a much more doubtful 6:03 source water taken in by ships this dr. 6:07 Bates explain has long been known to be 6:10 questionable ships are themselves 6:11 sources of heat readings will vary from 6:14 ship to ship in the depths of water 6:17 intake will vary according to how 6:18 heavily a ship is laden so affecting 6:21 temperature readings dr. Bates said they 6:24 had good data from buoys and they threw 6:27 it out and corrected it by using the bad 6:29 data from ships you never change good 6:32 data to agree with bad but that's what 6:35 they did so as to make it look as if the 6:37 sea was warmer 6:38 moreover the dot software used in 6:41 fraudulent study was afflicted by 6:44 serious bugs as they caused it to become 6:46 so unstable that every time the wrong 6:49 temperature readings were run through 6:50 the computer 6:51 it gave different results dr. Bates 6:54 revealed that the failure to archive and 6:56 make available fully document today to 6:58 not only violated know 7:00 the rules but also those set down by 7:02 science before he retired last year he 7:06 continued to raise the issue internally 7:08 then came the final bombshell dr. Bates 7:12 said I learned that the computer used to 7:14 process the software had suffered a 7:16 complete failure 7:17 the reason for the failure is unknown 7:20 but it means the fraudulent possible 7:23 sister paper can never be replicated or 7:25 verified by other scientists get it 7:28 fraud all the way along the line and a 7:31 cover-up to make an examination of the 7:33 fraud details impossible the perfect 7:36 worst-case scenario can we now at last 7:40 have a few criminal indictments even a 7:43 prosecuting attorney fresh out of Law 7:45 School wet behind the ears with zero 7:48 courtroom experience would be able to 7:51 secure a proper verdict guilty on all 7:53 counts guilty of fraud and aiding and 7:57 abetting a far-reaching scheme to reduce 7:59 energy production in America and other 8:01 nations on the premise that warming is 8:04 rising and must be stopped 8:06 ladies and gentlemen of the jury imagine 8:08 this the powers that be want to cut the 8:11 production of energy in this country 8:14 anyone can see the result of such a plan 8:16 we all become strapped we all become 8:19 poor but we're told this is necessary to 8:22 save us from the destruction of life on 8:24 Earth 8:25 we're told we have to go along with the 8:27 plan because producing energy releases 8:30 carbon dioxide which in turn keeps 8:32 raising the temperature of the planet 8:33 recently a key scientific study was 8:37 published and this study bolsters the 8:39 whole idea that global warming is on the 8:42 rise but a key expert insider will show 8:45 that this study was false and a frog in 8:47 the lie and the people who wrote these 8:49 are guilty of deceiving you and me and 8:51 everyone find these people guilty once 8:54 and for all and send them to prison 8:57 where they belong 8:58 I could try this case in court 9:01 you could try this case in court three 9:03 guys in the bar could try this case and 9:05 when are you ready mr. Drumm send out 9:09 the hounds from the department of 9:11 justice and put these layers under 9:13 arrest and let's see their trial and 9:15 open court every minute of it on camera 9:18 on television online 9:21 let's see it in new york and chicago and 9:24 los angeles in toronto in london and 9:26 paris and rome and Kabul and Iran and 9:28 Sydney in Tokyo and rio and Durban and 9:31 new can tierra del fuego at long last 9:34 put official science and it's a 9:36 neighbor's in the duck jon rappoport


The Financial Armageddon Economic Collapse Blog tracks trends and forecasts , futurists , visionaries , free investigative journalists , researchers , Whistelblowers , truthers and many more

1 comment:

  1. Dear John Bates: If you need to escape from America, a country that jails and murders whistleblowers who expose the truth, don't go to Russia, where Putin-the-a-hole will send you right back.

    ReplyDelete