William Cooper On Osama Bin Laden Al Qaeda & CIA

This is what people should know about—they ought to know that everything Alex Jones does is borrowed from or built upon this Bill Cooper’s work. And that doesn’t mean I hate Alex Jones—you can learn about Council on Foreign Relations from him, learn the British equivalent (RIIA), learn about the Rockefeller foundation being tied in with both Monsanto and Microsoft, and now—some 3 years after SyriusXM Radio finally got rid of that ultra-Zionist guy on its board of directors (he retired)—you can finally hear Jones going after Israel, AIPAC and the Rothschilds. He’ll introduce you to A&E for 9/11 Truth, concepts about the US military-industrial complex—mention the fact the Rothschilds and the rest of their Fed Res cronies are tied-in with the oil importers. Yet there’s a caveat, and it’s this: Alex Jones is paid to be a clown. He’s paid to make 9/11 truth movement seem like a bunch of trigger-happy, tinfoil hat paranoids who have no inner composure, no ability to contain their own emotions. And he showed the whole world this in no uncertain terms when Cenk Uygur brought him on The Young Turks to talk about threats to the 2nd Amendment and other government conspiracies (this, after Jones did the same needless histrionics on Piers Morgan Tonight—January of 2013). If you’re interested, here’s the Young Turks interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3TPeijF9Jc Notice how Richard Gage doesn’t do that crap. Notice how Jesse Venture doesn’t do it. I’ve never seen John Corbett or Sybil Edmonds do it. They don’t amp anything up, because they know that’s going to make the truth movement seem irrational; rather, they present what they have to present, and then they let the other guy be the one who starts emphatically insisting, “No, it has to be al-Qaeda!” or, “It has to be Putin’s fault!”, or “That’s just a bunch of nonsense conservatives say to insult Democrats,” or whatever. They let the supporters of official stories be the ones to make impassioned pleas, break a sweat, start speculating at not just one suspicious party, but maybe two dozen of them at the same time, trying to cram verbiage together with “this person said this, that person said that, and this, that, and the other person said…” Two days ago, I just watched a nearly hour-long lecture by Dr. Kevin Barrett talking about his new book which discusses the Charlie Hebdo false-flag (or at least all the suspicious circumstances which STRONGLY suggest it was a flag), and not once did I see Barrett flying into a rant of accusations against 10 different organizations at the same time (or 20 “Illuminati bloodlines”—or whatever else Jones goes off the handle about—the topics are nearly endless). But then again, Jones makes roughly $5 million a year on that show (SyriusXM contract and advertisements included)—he is a paid entertainer, and part of that “entertainment” is to make you and me look like boobs by way of our ideological relation to him. As for myself, I got into this movement for 2 reasons: 1.) I think all of humanity benefits when history is taught HONESTLY, 2.) I think it’s important to do all possible to prevent more wars (short of lying). Now, granted, if someone attacks our shores, then we have a right to defend ourselves—and that’s the very thing I hate most about the official 9/11 story, as it so clumsily pretends to be a justification for a war of defense. Still other people got into this movement for different reasons which are themselves rational. But then you have still another segment of this movement which really isn’t rationale, which is NOT based on allaying fears and/or sensationalism, but hyping these things, piling each higher and deeper—and when Jones gets interviewed by famous personalities, that’s the side of the movement he chooses to present (which turns off level-headed people in a BIG way). And would it be so bad if he just did that on his show, then presented a more dignified face when he’s getting interviewed? Not at all—after all, it is his show. Trouble is, he then does that in front of Piers Morgan and Cenk Uygur—and there’s no need. That’s not going to sway anyone watching those things, and he knows it. All it’s going to do is confirm people’s existing suspicions that everyone in the 9/11 truth movement is some sort of “Dale Gribble” (King of the Hill) who’s seeing CIA agents hiding at the bottom of his coffee cup. You do that, and no new investigations get undertaken—and certainly indictments grow out of any new investigations. And with nothing concluded, nobody under scrutiny, then everything just continues “as is”—there’s no public mandate to reinvestigate JFK’s shooting or force GMO foods to come with GMO labeling.  In a way, it doesn’t matter too much to me anymore. As I near age 50 and seriously consider what I’m going to be doing here on out with my life, I’m starting to get more into my artistic creations and work on a career in same. For a while, it seemed every geopolitical news story was vitally important. I suppose I thought the apocalypse was right around the proverbial bend, and that it would be a righteous undertaking on my part to warn people about same. Later, I realized that if this is truly the case—something as immense as the apocalypse—then there isn’t much I can do about it. And who is likely to survive it, anyway? Well, barring them all dying from infectious disease, probably the Amish—they grow all their own food, don’t depend too much on modern medicines, aren’t reliant on gasoline or nuclear energy, and don’t live in areas of racial strife. Whenever one of them gets sick, the rest band-together to nurse him back to health. And although the Amish do trade with currency, most would be just as happy to barter for goods they need—“earthly treasure” isn’t really a big deal with them. They teach their kids enough morality to avoid sexually transmitted illnesses.  And what do I think 9/11 truth is about anyway? I guess it’s about some form of love. You want people to live less like fools, as you have an agape-like love of humanity, and you know this universe doesn’t tend to reward foolishness. However, I’m discovering there are different ways of “making people wiser”, this, without necessarily one way being any more meaningful (or less important) than the others.  Regarding Alex Jones, I wonder if there won’t come a day when he really does do something that seriously puts a craw in the-powers-that-be, if only out of guilt over all the silly stuff he’s gotten attention with (not to mention used to improve his show ratings and advertising dollars). But by the same token, AJ has done a LOT of crap—a lot of attention-getting gimmicks he’s then lied about afterward (somewhere on the internet you can find a list of all the times since 1995 when he’s told his audience he had “inside information” a nationwide police state was going to be enacted in the next month or week, absolutely certain information, only to then play it down and forget about it once the magic day arrived). Therefore, in his case I imagine finally “being like Bill Cooper”—finally getting himself in trouble for spilling some useful information (and presenting it like a sane person, rather than a lunatic) would be an act of contrition on his part.


The Financial Armageddon Economic Collapse Blog tracks trends and forecasts , futurists , visionaries , free investigative journalists , researchers , Whistelblowers , truthers and many more