What would happen if we didn't have a central bank? Prof. Lawrence H.
White explains that private banks would be able to circulate money by
issuing notes and checks redeemable for coin. Trustworthy banks would
make arrangements to accept each other's notes and checks. Banks would
have better incentives than the federal government to ensure their
currency retained its value, because if it didn't, people would bank
elsewhere. By contrast, central banks controlled by the government are
able to devalue currency as they see fit and can even quit redeeming
notes for coins of real value if they want to do so. It sounds like
social-science fiction, but there are numerous real-world examples in
history of successful free-banking systems. In fact, central banks arose
largely because governments wanted an institution willing and able to
lend them money with easy terms, not because of any problem with the
free-banking system. Free markets offer the most efficient system for
allocating goods and services, and money is no exception. As failures
among central banking systems mount, it is time to reconsider the
alternative of free banking.
With no central bank we would have our Treasury department to issue no-interest money and fund necessary projects and gov. We would not be forced to borrow our own money at interest and continue debt-money slavery.
ReplyDeleteSo called "free banking" would just mean more of control by big wall street banks swallowing up little banks - utter monetary oligarchy