Lead Up To WW3: Vladimir Putin Talks About Syria Chemical Weapons Accusations. Where is the Evidence?
Following
twin war drum speeches by Secretary of State John Kerry and Obama on
Friday, the corporate media, led by the traditional master of war
propaganda, the New York Times, speculated that the United States might
not attack Syria if it can't nail down support.
"Deprived of the
support of Britain, America's most stalwart wartime ally, the Obama
administration scrambled behind the scenes to build international
support elsewhere for a strike that might begin as early as this
weekend," the Time reports. "Officials were still holding out hope that
at least one Arab country might publicly join the military coalition."
One
Arab nation? How pathetic. None of this matters because so-called
partners, consensus and the "need to establish American credibility" has
little to do with the drive to bomb Syria.
Bombing Syria — or
any other country — is about business: the prospect of bombs over
Damascus is about profits for the military-industrial complex. It is
about transnational corporations and international banks that stand to
gain both obscene profits and unprecedented political power in a
geopolitical chess game.
If you doubt this, check out the graphs
below. They reveal something not broadcast on the front page of the New
York Times: wars and rumors of war drive the markets.
Syria is
expecting a military strike "at any moment," a security official said on
Saturday, only hours after U.N. inspectors left the country after
investigating the aftermath of suspected chemical weapons attacks said
to be perpetrated by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's regime.
"We
are expecting an attack at any moment. We are ready to retaliate at any
moment," an unnamed Syrian security official told AFP news agency.
The
departure of the U.N. inspectors has given the United States an
opportunity to carry out a military strike, after President Barack Obama
on Friday indicated that military intervention was pending.
The
U.S. president said that his administration was looking at the
possibility of a "limited, narrow act," while emphasizing that no final
decision had yet been made on possible military strikes against the
Syrian regime.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has declared
'utter nonsense' the idea that the Syrian government has used chemical
weapons on its own people and called on the US to present its supposed
evidence to the UN Security Council.
On Friday, Washington said a
plan for a limited military response was in the works to punish Assad
for a "brutal and flagrant" chemical attack that allegedly killed more
than 1400 people in the capital Damascus 10 days ago.
Washington
has been basing its proposed strategy of an attack on Syria on the
premise that President Bashar Assad's government forces have used
chemical agents, while Russia finds the accusations unacceptable and the
idea of performing a military strike on the country even more so.
Especially as it would constitute a violation of international law, if
carried out without the approval of the UN Security Council.
Russia's
President Vladimir Putin said on Saturday it would be "utter nonsense"
for the Syrian government to use chemical weapons when it was winning
its war with rebels, and urged U.S. President Barack Obama not to attack
Syrian forces.
Putin told journalists that if Obama had
evidence Assad's forces had the chemical weapons and launched the
attack, Washington should present it to the U.N. weapons inspectors and
the Security Council.
"I am convinced that it (the chemical
attack) is nothing more than a provocation by those who want to drag
other countries into the Syrian conflict, and who want to win the
support of powerful members of the international arena, especially the
United States," Putin said.
The Russian president said Obama, as a
Nobel Peace Prize laureate, should remember the impact any U.S. attack
would have on Syrian civilians.
World powers should discuss the
Syrian crisis at a meeting of the leaders of the Group of 20 developed
and developing nations in St. Petersburg next week, he added. "This (G20
summit) is a good platform to discuss the problem. Why not use it?"
Putin said
Very Smooth n to the point.
ReplyDelete