Mark Dice -- The Alex Jones Show(VIDEO Commercial Free) Sunday March 23 2014

On the live Sunday, March 23 transmission of Infowars Live, Alex Jones rectifies the media's confusion over the Obamacare penalty after an all-out assault was waged on Internet pioneer Matt Drudge, who on Friday asserted he had just paid the "liberty tax" for not getting covered. Alex also dissects the flopping failure that is Obamacare and marvels at its miserable enrollment figures, which the healthcare law is supposedly dependent upon. On today's show, Jones tackles the increasingly volatile situation in Ukraine, and analyzes the US government's latest attempt to suppress the First Amendment by way of a new media shield law, which antithetically doesn't "shield" alternative media journalists like activist Mark Dice, a vocal opponent of the Obama administration, who recently had his immensely popular Youtube channel taken down.

Will Putin and Russia cause Armageddon by 2019? Prophecies

Will Putin and Russia cause Armageddon by 2019? Will Putin start World War 3 by 2019? Prophecies. Will Putin invade more former Soviet Union countries, after Georgia and Crimea in the Ukraine? Yes, another one soon I think. Bible prophecies of Revelation. Putin is identified as the Antichrist of Book of Revelation chapter 13.

Which country will Russia and Putin invade next? Will Russia invade another country? The prophecy of the 3 horns in the Book of Daniel - Georgia, Ukraine and Crimea, and one more to come. A major war could result. Vladimir Putin President of Russia could be the Antichrist in the Bible Book of Revelation chapter 13, whose number is 666. Likely that Putin will next invade and take over another former Soviet Union country. Astrology chart for August 1999 indicates Putin is the Antichrist since he first rose to power then in Russia.
The invasion of Ukraine by Russia in 2014, and Bible prophecies on the Antichrist in the Book of Revelation and Daniel.Violent protests in Ukraine in 2014, and Daniel Prophecy 7:8 of the Antichrist.Who is the Antichrist? Identified as Russian President Putin.
And Russian takeover invasion of Crimea and parts of Ukraine, Russian military exercise near Ukraine. After a vote in Crimea Russia occupied and incorporated it into Russia.
(Recorded March 23 2014)
Relates to the rise of the Antichrist Putin in Russia. The Antichrist (666) is identified as Vladimir Putin in Russia. Astrology charts and Bible Prophecy of the Book of Revelation on the Antichrist 666. Putin I think wants to recapture the former Soviet Union states in a Stalinist dictatorship with him in charge with total control, and Putin wants to be worshiped as a deity. .
Putin is the Antichrist for many reasons explained on my web site. For example, Putin first rose to power as Russian Prime Minister in August 1999, when there was an unusual astrology alignment of planets in a cross shape, and a solar eclipse over Europe, indicative of the rise of the Antichrist. And Putin became Russian President as the new millenium began on Jan. 1 2000. And Putin was reelected and began his term as Russian President near May 5 2000 when there was an unusual alignment of planets.

See this page for details on why I think Putin is the Antichrist 666 of the Bible's Book of Revelation chapter 13:

http://revelation13.net/Putin.html

US 'Democracy Promotion' Destroys Democracy Overseas -- Ron Paul

US 'Democracy Promotion' Destroys Democracy Overseas
by Ron Paul

It was almost ten years ago when, before the House International Relations Committee, I objected to the US Government funding NGOs to meddle in the internal affairs of Ukraine. At the time the "Orange Revolution" had forced a regime change in Ukraine with the help of millions of dollars from Washington.

At that time I told the Committee: We do not know exactly how many millions—or tens of millions—of dollars the United States government spent on the presidential election in Ukraine. We do know that much of that money was targeted to assist one particular candidate, and that through a series of cut-out non-governmental organizations (NGOs)—both American and Ukrainian—millions of dollars ended up in support of the presidential candidate...

I was worried about millions of dollars that the US government-funded National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and its various related organizations spent to meddle in Ukraine's internal affairs. But it turns out that was only the tip of the iceberg.

Last December, US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland gave a speech in which she admitted that since 1991 the US government has: [I]nvested more than 5 billion dollars to help Ukraine...in the development of democratic institutions and skills in promoting civil society and a good form of government.

This is the same State Department official who was caught on tape just recently planning in detail the overthrow of the Ukrainian government.

That five billion dollars appears to have bought a revolution in Ukraine. But what do the US taxpayers get, who were forced to pay for this interventionism? Nothing good. Ukraine is a bankrupt country that will need tens of billions of dollars to survive the year. Already the US-selected prime minister has made a trip to Washington to ask for more money.

And what will the Ukrainians get? Their democracy has been undermined by the US-backed coup in Kiev. In democracies, power is transferred peacefully through elections, not seized by rebels in the streets. At least it used to be.

The IMF will descend on Ukraine to implement yet another of its failed rescue plans, which enrich the well-connected and international bankers at the expense of the local population. The IMF adds debt, organizes sweetheart deals for foreign corporations, and demands that the local population accept "austerity" in exchange for "reform" that never seems to produce the promised results.

The groundwork for this disaster has been laid by NED, USAID, and the army of NGOs they have funded over the years in Ukraine.

Supporters of NED and its related organizations will argue that nothing is wrong with sending US dollars to "promote democracy" overseas. The fact is, however, that NED, USAID, and the others have nothing to do with promoting democracy and everything to do with destroying democracy.

It is not democracy to send in billions of dollars to push regime change overseas. It isn't democracy to send in the NGOs to re-write laws and the constitution in places like Ukraine. It is none of our business.

How should we promote democracy overseas? First, we should stop the real isolationists — those who seek to impose sanctions and blockades and restrictions that impede our engagement overseas. We can promote democracy with a US private sector that engages overseas. A society that prospers through increased trade ties with the US will be far more likely to adopt practices and policies that continue that prosperity and encourage peace.

In 2005, arguing against funding NED in the US foreign assistance authorization bill, I said: The National Endowment for Democracy...has very little to do with democracy. It is an organization that uses US tax money to actually subvert democracy, by showering funding on favored political parties or movements overseas. It underwrites color-coded 'people's revolutions' overseas that look more like pages out of Lenin's writings on stealing power than genuine indigenous democratic movements.

Sadly, matters are even worse now. To promote democracy overseas, NED and all other meddling US government funded NGOs should be disbanded immediately.

--
Dr. Paul's 2004 committee remarks on Ukraine and NGO's:
http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/...